Предыдущая публикация
Share Share Share
AWAKEN TO WOKE HYPOCRISY
(Woke is the 'neo-morality' which causes violent crime, hence fear, hence a desire for more law enforcement, hence more power for the ruling class.)
Think hard it's plain to see
Wokeism lacks practicality.
Why are you too blind to see
that you're serving aristocracy?
They rant on accusingly.
They blind you with publicity
that's riddled with hypocrisy
and plain outright dishonesty.
The fact they got to dig into history,
shows they got nothing to pin on me.
And they have the sheer audacity
to cancel and smear rationality.
We all know, it's plain to see
this encourages criminality.
So, get a better grip on reality
and try to be a man of piety
by dumping this warped ideology.
It's no longer cool to be PC.
You're welcome to try to criticize me.
It improves me, intellectually.
It would help if you did so effectively.
Not repeating things incessantly.
Don't help the Wokeist conspiracy.
Don't be a pawn for the ruling gentry.
Scrap this Wokeist philosophy.
Replace it with true morality!
Which doesn't aid criminality
and doesn't harm your community!
Wokeism is the current mainstream 'morality' of the Western World. While the early forms of Woke were anti-Hitlerian, it has since been corrupted and has become quite Hitlerian in many ways.
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS OF WOKEISM
(Funny but true!)
1. THOU SHALL HATE, FOR THE CULT OF WOKEISM IS NOT ONE OF LOVE NOR PRAISE, BUT ONE OF CONDEMNATION AND VENGEANCE; AND RECOGNIZES NO SAINTS, ONLY SINNERS.
2. THOU SHALL HONOR THE BULLY, AND GRANT THE GREATEST WOKE PRIVILEGE TO GROUPS WHO HAVE BULLIES SUPPORTING THEIR INTERESTS.
3. THOU SHALL CANCEL ANY FREE SPEECH PRIVILEGES OF THOSE WHO EXPRESS DISSENT.
4. THOU SHALL NOT MAKE JUDGEMENTS BASED ON RACE, PREJUDICE OR ANY KIND OF STEREOTYPE - HOWEVER, JUDGMENTS ABOUT A CERTAIN RACE ARE FINE.
5. THOU SHALL BLAME A CERTAIN RACE OF PEOPLE FOR THE UNDERACHIEVEMENTS AND SHORTCOMINGS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT OF THAT RACE.
6. THOU SHALL NOT ABUSE PEOPLE FOR THEIR SEXUAL ORIENTATION - UNLESS THEY ARE HETEROSEXUAL MALES.
7. THOU SHALL ACCUSE HETEROSEXUAL MALES, WHO SUBTLY EXPRESS ADMIRATION FOR FEMALES, OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT.
8. THOU SHALL BITTERLY OPPOSE PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION TOWARDS PEOPLE WHO ARE THOUGHT TO BE POOR, MARGINALIZED, OR OTHERWISE DISADVANTAGED - EXCEPT FOR HOMELESS PEOPLE.
9. THOU SHALL BE IMPARTIAL TO THE FACT THAT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST HOMELESS PEOPLE IS LEGAL IN THESE WOKE TIMES; AND ALSO TO THE MEDIA MAKING NEGATIVE STEREOTYPES OF SUCH PEOPLE.
10. THOU SHALL HATE HITLER, EVEN THOUGH HE TOO IS GUILTY OF HATE, RACISM, DISCRIMINATION, CANCELLATION OF FREE SPEECH, BULLYING AND BLAMING A CERTAIN RACE OF PEOPLE FOR GERMANY'S UNDERACHIEVEMENTS AND SHORTCOMINGS.
Why do those who call themselves liberals cater to bullies?
Some say Wokeism is merely an awareness of black suffering which creates sympathy and hence improvement. And yes, there have been improvements since the 60s, when Wokeism became popular. There has been affirmative action, sympathetic media coverage, more public spending, less policing in the ghettos and other improvements. There are now more black politicians and other elected officials and there are now more popular black actors. One sees a lot of blacks in television advertisements too. But what is the overall effect for the common black man? There have been some negative side effects, especially with regards to the sympathetic media coverage. Like the story of the blind men and the elephant, the sympathetic media coverage often gives a one-sided, misleading picture. Some have referred to it as 'race hate propaganda'. Furthermore if you tell a guy that he will never make it because of an invisible wall of 'systemic racism' you might discourage him from striving for achievement and make crime more attractive for him. Since the passing of the Civil Rights Act, the average wage gap between blacks and whites has been about the same and unemployment among blacks hasn't changed and is still about double that of whites. So the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not improve this. Furthermore there has been a significant change in the black incarceration rate, which is about double what it was in 1960. Furthermore, as Wokism encourages crime, many black neighborhoods have become considerably more dangerous than they were in 1960. Nowadays the leading cause of death, among young black men, is homicide by other young black men. There was a major rise in violent crime from the mid 1960s until the mid 1990s, many new laws were passed, and there was heavier law enforcement and this was followed, not surprisingly, by an increase in the incarceration rate. So by the late 1990s America, the land of the free, had the world's highest incarceration rate. So is Wokism really benefiting blacks? Why is it that anyone, with a platform, is unable to be open and straightforward about it? How can we all get along if we cannot give constructive criticism to each other?
While some Wokeists harp on about compassion, there are many who exploit Wokeism to selfish or nefarious ends. Jussie Smollett being a well known example. Many a cop, who has caught a perp red-handed, has been called a racist. Cops are often called racists just for doing their jobs. It's a means of manipulation. One evening, when I was a teenager, a 40yo man got me drunk and then asked me for sex. When I refuse, he implied I was racist and homophobic. Then there is the claim that 'systemic racism' is the cause of underachievement, unproductivity and crime among certain minorities. However the levels of such things are consistent with the levels of such things in countries where those minorities are the majority. It is not just common criminals who exploit wokeism. Mainstream media will lead you to believe that the only threat to the environment is greenhouse gasses. Not overhunting, overfishing deforestation and other habitat destruction and population growth. Can it be that this is because the latter five occur mainly in the third world, while the first can be blamed mainly on a certain race? Is the environmental debate being racialized? It appears that it is. In the 1990s, tree hugging and other attempts to save forests, were becoming popular. Some big businesses were not happy with this. Those who wish to vilify environmentalists accuse them of keeping the poor poor. Of stopping the development of the third world. However, the overwhelming majority (if not all) of the third world countries where deforestation, habitat destruction and development were allowed to proceed, are still third world countries. So the poor are still poor. So that Wokeist argument is a scam. And the Woke clearly play a role in damaging the biosphere which sustains us.
How can we all get along without freedom of speech? Why would anybody, with a practical and useful philosophy, object - in any way - to constructive criticism?
Then there is that particularly hateful form of feminism winch labels men, who do very subtle things like trying to make eye contact or trying to start a conversation, as sex pests. Not surprisingly this is caused a rise in incels, frustrated, single, young men, who are more likely to commit violent crime.
There is strong evidence that Woke is a form of 'divide and rule' in that nasty rumors and policies are used to insight hatred and violent crime and grant more power to the ruling class - who are protected in in their gated communities.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Следующая публикация
Нет комментариев